
by Bassam Jarrar - Noon Center /Palestina
The Arabic alphabet comprises 29 letters. However, in
the Abecedarian alphabet there are 28 because there is considered to be no
difference between Hamza and Alif. What concerns us about this Abecedarian order
is the link between it and the Jum’mal numerical values of the letters
(the NVL) mentioned in the previous chapter. As mentioned above the system is
common to both Hebrew and Arabic but the Hebrew and Abecedarian Arabic systems
only coincide up to the letter ت. After that, Arabic has the extra letters
ث, خ, ذ, ض, ظ and غ which can be combined in the mnemonic
(though meaningless) phrase thakhath dathagh.
It is not easy trace the origin of the Abecedarian order and the
calculation associated with it in Semitic languages because views on it have
diverged in such a way that it is difficult to decide which is correct or even
to make a choice between them. The Jewish clergy use it extensively, Muslims
have used it in historical dating, Sufis have overused it, and
fortune-tellers, magicians and sorcerers have used it too. Thus, although the
calculation may have had a religious basis it has been later distorted, altered
and abused.
The Abecedarian order in North Africa differs slightly from the well-known order which is used in the East. In mnemonic form the latter consists of the following letters: Abjad Hawaz Hutti Kalamun Saa’fas qurishat thakhath Dathagh. Each letter has a numerical value as shown in the table below:
| A | B | G | D | H | W | Z | Ha | TA | Y |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| K | L | M | N | Sin | 'Ain | F | Sad | Qaf | - |
| 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 | - |
| Ra | Chin | T | TH | KH | DH | Dad | Dhad | Ghin | - |
| 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 | 600 | 700 | 800 | 900 | 1000 | - |
|
أ |
ب |
ج |
د |
ه |
و |
ز |
ح |
ط |
ي |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
ك |
ل |
م |
ن |
س |
ع |
ف |
ص |
ق |
|
|
20 |
30 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
70 |
80 |
90 |
100 |
|
|
ر |
ش |
ت |
ث |
خ |
ذ |
ض |
ظ |
غ |
|
|
200 |
300 |
400 |
500 |
600 |
700 |
800 |
900 |
1000
|
|
In the Jum’mal (the NVL) it is noticed that there is no difference
between the numerical values of Alif and Hamza, because it refers to the
Abecedarian, rather than the Alphabetical, letters. This calculation has been
used for various purposes – Muslims have used it to date battles, deaths,
buildings etc. as mentioned above.
Examples of use
When Sultan Barquq, a Burji Mamluk, died, a phrase was
coined indicating the date of his death. This phrase was في
المشمش (fil-mishmish). [It means, literally:
“In the apricot (season)” which is very short, so the implication in current
usage at least is of transience]. It seems that they chose a humorous phrase,
but also the numerical values of the phrase are 80+10+1+30+40+300+40+300. The
total is 801, and thus Sultan Barquq died in 801 AH.
Another example is, when a poet called Dalenjawi died,
his friend eulogized him in general verses and at the end dated his death with
the phrase مات الشعر بعده (maat a-sha’oru ba’da) which means:
“Poetry died after him.” This came
after the words “I dated…” which indicated the point at which to begin counting
– i.e. after “dated”. Thus, the
date of Dalenjawi’s death is: 40+1+400+1+30+300+70+200+2+ 70+4+5=1123 AH.
It is clear that this use of calculation in chronology is thus not
objectionable from a religious viewpoint because it is a matter of convention
and is thus permissible. However, the misuse of this system in the areas of
fortune telling, magic and sorcery has created negative associations with a
system that is not intrinsically negative.
Muhammad Ben Omar Nuwawi Al-Jawi, an interpreter, Sufi
and Shafi’i jurist, migrated to Makka and died there in the year 1316 AH. He
produced many works, one of which is a two-volume interpretation of the Qur’an
in which he said in the introduction: “I have titled this book to confirm to its
date” – مراح لبيد الكسف معفىى قران مجيد. It is clear from these words
that he chose a title to conform to the Jum’mal system to show the date he began
writing his book (1304 AH). I have cited this particular example to give
evidence of a Muslim scholar’s attitude towards the question of the Jum’mal system and to show that nothing
was found to be wrong in using such a system, even for a book on Qur’anic
interpretation. We have used it for generations so why don’t we reconsider using
it again since we have found it to be beneficial.
Another famous Qur’anic commentator, Baidawi, says in
his interpretation of the opening of Surat Al-Baqara that the Prophet (pbuh) was
approached by the Jews and he recited to them the opening of Al-Baqara. They
calculated the numerical values of the letters of the opening and said: “How can
we enjoin a religion that will last only seventy-one years?” The Prophet (pbuh)
smiled. They said: “Is there anything else?” He said: المر, الر, المص and they replied that he had confused them
and they know longer knew which Faith to follow. Baidawi comments on this Hadith
by saying: “His reciting to them in this order and his confirmation of their
inference…” Thus, Baidawi considers that the Apostle (pbuh) confirmed their
inference.
In Shihab’s commentary on Baidawi’s interpretation he says: “ This Hadith
was verified by Bukhari in his history and by Ibn Jarir through Ibn Issac
Al-Kalbi… Its chain of narrators is weak.” Thus we cannot rely on Baidawi’s
conclusion, though on the other hand the Prophet never said anything that denied
that Jum’mal had a religious basis.
What matters is that there is neither evidence for denial nor confirmation.
Although we must be careful not to assume that we are building on absolutely
solid foundations we find that confirmation is more likely in the light of this
weak Hadith. We can prove by induction that the Qur’an has kept some secrets in
certain words and clauses and therefore, we assume that the Qur’an has used this
linguistic convention of the Semitic languages. After all, the Qur’an was
revealed in Arabic!
Since language suggests meanings there is no reason to prevent it from
suggesting numerical values. The question is: How can we know that a certain
phrase in the Qur’an carries such a numerical secret? Our answer to this is that
this has to be proven either through Islamic legal methods or by reasoning. The
reader will find that our approach to this question is new and has nothing to do
with the Sufis or others, whether they did the right thing or erred and
deviated. We are satisfied that the reader will be convinced by the examples of
the Jum’mal system that we will give
that are based only on induction and not hearsay.
Following are examples that open the door for a new direction in Jum’mal, examples that simply involve
calculation based on Qur’anic vocabulary. It should be pointed out that in our
research we are dealing with the Qur’anic script called Ottoman script, which is
regarded by the majority of scholars as a revelation (Tawqifi) in itself,
because it was supervised by the Prophet as revealed to him. Me
Example 1
The Sacred Mosque (المسجد الحرام) is defined in the Qur’an as:
للذي ببكه
مباركا - “at Bakka
(Makkah) full of blessing” (3:96). The Jum’mal of this aya is 1063. The
Farthest Mosque (المسجد الاقصى) is described: الذي
بركنا حوله - “whose precincts We have blessed” (17:1). The
Jum’mal of this aya is also
1063. We ask, what does it mean that they both have the same numerical
value?
Example 2
Sura 17, ‘Al-Isra’, the Sura that begins with the
second quotation of the first example, is also called Surat Bani Israel (‘The
Children of Israel’). The Farthest Mosque is only mentioned once in the Qur’an,
in this position. The subsequent
verses discuss Jewish corruption (إفساد) on earth and their being “elated with mighty
arrogance” (17:4) suggesting actual political power. This combination of
corruption and arrogant power shall happen twice. Each time the corruption ends
with the entry of the Jews’ enemies into Masjid Al-Aqsa. In other words, the
mention of Al-Aqsa necessitates mentioning Jewish corruption in the area, once
before Islam and once after. Masjid Al-Aqsa (المسجد الاقصى) is written in Ottoman script as
(المسجد
الاقصا), the Jum’mal value of which is 361 (i.e.
19×19). As discussed above, the number 19 is the root of a Qur’anic numerical
miracle. The phrase Bani Israel (بنو إسرائيل), written in the Ottoman copy as
(بنو
إسرءيل), also has a
Jum’mal value of 361. (We have
explored the further implications contained in this aya in another piece
of research entitled ‘The Year 2022 and the Fall of Israel').
Example 3
Surat Al-Naml (النمل) opens with the two letters طس. The Serial order of the Sura in the
Mus’haf is 27 and we have found that the frequency of the letter
ط in the Sura is also 27.
س on the other hand occurs 93 times
in the Sura. 93 happens to be the number of verses in the Sura. Thus, the total
frequency of ط
and س is 120, which is the total of the serial
number of the Sura plus its number of verses. Finally, the Jum’mal of the word Naml
(نمل) is 120.
Example 4
White can be considered to be the basis of all colors
because white light can be refracted into the seven colors of the spectrum. If
mixed in different proportions these can then create thousands of colors. The Jum’mal of white (أبيض) is 1+2+10+800=813.
|
Word |
Sura |
Verse No. |
|
ابيضت |
3 |
107 |
|
ابيضت |
12 |
84 |
|
تبيض |
3 |
106 |
|
الأبيض |
2 |
187 |
|
بيضاء |
7 |
108 |
|
بيضاء |
20 |
22 |
|
بيضاء |
26 |
33 |
|
بيضاء |
27 |
12 |
|
بيضاء |
28 |
32 |
|
بيضاء |
37 |
46 |
|
بيض |
35 |
27 |
|
بيض |
37 |
49 |
|
|
Total |
813 |
- The
serial order of Surat Al-Hadad is 57 and the number of verses in it is 29. If we
multiply 29×57 the result is 1653, which is
the total of numbers 1-57. (i.e.: 1+2+3+4…+57)
The word حديد occurs in the Qur’an in Sura 22 (‘Al-Hajj’)
and Sura 50 (‘Qaf’) and the word حديدا occurs in Sura 17 (‘Bani Israel’). The word
الحديد occurs in Sura 18(‘Al-Kahf’), Sura 34
(‘Saba’) and Sura 57. After Surat
Al-Hadid itself the word is not mentioned. Thus the word for iron occurs 6 times
in the Qur’an in 6 different Suras. The word حديدا in Sura 17 is the 667th word in the Sura
while the word الحديد in Sura 18 is the 1402nd. The word
حديد in Sura 22 is the 368th and the
word الحديد in Sura 34 is 177th. The word حديد in Sura 50 is the 183rd word in the Sura
while the word الحديد in Sura al-Hadid (number 57) is the 461st.
Thus the total for all the word positions is: 667+1402+368+177+183+461=3258, the
square root of which is almost exactly 57, (57.0788 in fact).
|
Word |
Sura |
Word no. in Sura |
|
حديدا |
17 |
667 |
|
الحديد |
18 |
1402 |
|
حديد |
22 |
368 |
|
الحديد |
34 |
177 |
|
حديد |
50 |
183 |
|
الحديد |
57 |
461 |
|
|
Total |
3258 |
The
word
الحديد in Surat Al-Hadid comes in
aya 25 as: “And We sent down iron.” In reply to the implied question as
to what the wisdom behind sending down iron is, this line is followed by the
answer: “…In which is material for
mighty war as well as many benefits for mankind, that Allah may test who, Unseen, will help
Him and his Apostles, for Allah is full of strength, exalted in might.”
If we calculate the Jum’mal of this
aya we find that it is 3263, the square root of which is again just over
57. (57.12 in fact). The difference between 3263 and the total of the positions
of the word حديد is 5! So, what is the secret?!
Example 6